Why Can You Choose The Wrong Leader?

  Why Can You Choose the Wrong Leader?

A leader is a person who leads or supervises a group of people, an organization, or an activity. Leaders must have the ability to organize and direct others so that they can achieve the goals set. Leaders must have good management, communication, motivation, and empathy skills to be able to do their jobs successfully.
 

Mistakes in selecting leaders

1. Lack of Experience: Picking a leader who doesn't have enough experience in a particular field can be disastrous. Leaders must have sufficient knowledge to direct others to succeed in achieving goals.
2. Not Considering Eligibility: Selecting a leader who doesn't have the right qualifications can hinder the success of a project. Leaders must have the right skills and qualifications to achieve the desired goals.
3. Lack of Coordination: When undertaking a project with a large team, coordination between team members is essential. Selecting a leader who cannot work effectively with others can hinder project progress.
4. Lack of communication skills: communication is an essential part of being a leader. Choosing a leader who can't communicate goals, strategies, and plans well can hinder project progress.
5. Lack of Management Skills: A leader must have good management skills to achieve goals. Selecting a leader who lacks sufficient management skills can hinder project progress.

There is a mistake that is sometimes forgotten by many people when choosing a leader, namely choosing leaders from the same organizational background.
 
Why do you have the same background?
    

    

 We need to discuss it more deeply; Political control organizations want people in these organizations to hold positions in several organizations related to politics in order to get a good name and make them superpower organizations. And we must understand that they typically seek strategic positions in which they can exercise greater influence, such as a chairman. If we trace the political organization together, it becomes a struggle to make it a dynastic organization, where the leader is led from year to year by someone with the same organizational background. If this occurs, the flow and journey of the political organization will undoubtedly look the same because the ideas and ideas that are owned are no different from the organization that oversees them.

I once talked a little with the barber brother while he was cutting my hair; we discussed a little about the organization and the leader. He once said, "If a political organization is led by someone with the same organizational background, there will definitely be no innovation and significant changes will occur because they live and hang out in the same place so their thoughts will just revolve there," and there are other words from him that I remember, "everyone has interests and they place their interests there." Oh yes, this brother is someone who is active in student organizations at Padang State University.

So to choose a leader is not that easy; we need to know their personal background, the organization they have joined, and the track record of the organization.

What do you think?